The Man of the Debate
Some comments from annilneto.com:
iammi on July 15th, 2008 at 10.20pm
It was so clear that Anwar was speaking like a PM, with substance, precise and professional. Shabery was no match at all, nothing new in his arguments and looked like someone very desparate grasping for straws as he could not rebut Anwar’s argument and had to resort to personal attacks.
ali allah ditta on July 15th, 2008 at 10.19pm
The question of who wins who lose does not arise.
However, now we know exactly what Anwar will do if he takes over the gomen. As for Ahmad Sabery,being a Minister he cannot do much but got to defend the gomen whatever it takes. What upset me,is the personal attack embark by Sabery in the course of his arguement.
NotMyType on July 15th, 2008 at 10.26pm
Anwar! stop debating with kids. Orang tanya Utara dia jawab Selatan. Anyway it was pleasure to hear our future PM speak and indeed a relief to have identified that we actually have clowns in the August House.
Patrick on July 15th, 2008 at 10.27pm
My opinion is that Shaberry touches more on ‘historical’ happenings and to some extent made personal attacks on anwar which may be perceived as his inability to provide relavant answers to some of the questions.
anak perelih on July 15th, 2008 at 10.29pm
Looks like there will be a cabinet reshuffle tomorrow as Shabery Chik lost the debate… hehehhe
raj raman666 on July 15th, 2008 at 10.40pm
Cool as ice – when personal attack.
Shabery – small boy still learning how to talk.
Shabery gang – The Tan Sri – shaky question like he have no confident – product of rusty mind.
Anwar gang – as confident as Anwar.
Winner – ANWAR IBRAHIM.
RAJRAMAN – piss of about Anwar because few times talking about bumiputra.So indian and chinese will dream like me as MALAYSIAN PUTRA IN MY DREAM.
Kenny Gan on July 15th, 2008 at 10.46pm
Shabery delving into the past to make cheap personal attacks on Anwar is unbecoming. He even goes back to 1974 Baling demo – how low can you go? Just keep to the issue, s…!
Report by Leo