Fuziah Salleh

Mendamba Politik Baru

Walk-out by Pakatan Rakyat

Photobucket Photobucket

Photobucket

Photobucket Photobucket

Photobucket

No-confidence motion rejected, opposition stages walkout
Soon Li Tsin, Rahmah Ghazali and Tarani Palani | Jul 14, 08 12:59pm
Dewan Rakyat Speaker Pandikar Amin Mulia today disallowed a no-confidence debate against Prime Minister Abdullah Ahmad Badawi, resulting in a walk-out by opposition Pakatan Rakyat MPs.

MCPX

Pandikar rejected the emergency motion filed by Opposition Leader Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail on Friday on the grounds that the issue had already been debated last month.

According to the Speaker, the debate on the oil price hike filed by Domestic Trade and Consumer Affairs Minister Shahrir Abdul Samad on June 23 was a no-confidence motion.

In that motion, the government won with a vote of 129 against 78.

At noon, Wan Azizah stood up in the Dewan Rakyat to ask the Speaker to reconsider his decision against allowing the no-confidence debate.

However, Pandikar refused to entertain the request.

“I do not even need to give a reason for rejecting a motion. I have read the motion and it asks for a resolution and that does not fall under Standing Order 18(1) in which it is filed under.”

“How can I allow something that does not fall within this SO (standing orders)? If I allowed it, the whole world will look at me and see if I make a stupid decision or not,” he said.

Shouting match

This led to a shouting match with BN MPs telling their opposition counterparts to sit while a visibly agitated Pandikar Amin hammered his gavel several times demanding for order.

Around 12.20pm, Wan Azizah then announced that Pakatan Rakyat MPs would walk out since they were not given the opportunity to carry the voice of the public to the August House.

Outside the hall, the PKR president told reporters that she was unhappy with the way the emergency motion was dealt with by both the Speaker and the police.

“I want to know why was the motion rejected. This is the government’s reaction to us because we wanted to debate a motion democratically in Parliament.

“We’re disappointed and we regret that this has happened. Is this a siege? What is there to it? The Speaker only needs to give 30 minutes for us to speak and another 30 for the government to speak.

“This is why we walked out. They disrespect the rules and the voice of the people that we carry into the house,” she said.

She said the opposition will also boycott the rest of today’s proceedings to protest against the police action today in turning Parliament into a “war zone”.

There was a heavy police presence in Parliament as roadblocks were mounted along major roads leading to the building causing massive traffic jams.

Why bar Anwar?

The roadblocks are in anticipation of a protest ahead of the possible no-confidence debate.

However, the opposition denied calling for a rally and the police yesterday obtained a court order barring PKR de facto leader Anwar Ibrahim from the vicinity.

Commenting on this, Wan Azizah expressed amazement at the overreaction by various parties over Anwar’s interest in attending Parliament.

anwar ibrahim 02 060207“He expressed his interest to attend parliament to hear the motion and that triggered such an amazing reaction.

“How can an individual be barred from entering if he is a guest of mine? Until there is a directive that any guest of the MP is not allowed in. I don’t understand.

parliament building police blockade 140708 16“I want the inspector-general of police to explain why is there this (overblown) reaction,” she said, adding that it gives the impression that Malaysia is a police state.

On whether Pakatan will file a similar motion in future, Wan Azizah said the parties will discuss to see what to do next.

Not the right order

At a separate press conference, Pandikar Amin said the opposition MPs had a right to stage a walkout but declined to comment on it.

parliament speaker pandikar aminHe also explained the reason why he wrote to Wan Azizah this morning – before Parliament began – to reject the emergency motion in chambers.

According to him, the opposition had filed their emergency motion for a resolution under Standing Orders 18 but that standing order only allows for debates.

“It is not the proper standing order. SO 18(1) and (2) does not allow for vote of no-confidence to be carried out. It is like a person who had committed raped but was charged for murder. You cannot do that,” he said.

He explained that the emergency motion requesting for a resolution which leads to voting should be filed under SO 27.

Pandikar Amin also said that the debate on the security and leadership has already been discussed on June 23 during Shahrir’s emergency motion debate on the fuel price hike and the mid-term review of the 9th Malaysian Plan.

“If I had allowed the motion, I will be seen as the most stupid Speaker in the world for allowing a motion filed under the wrong SO to be debated.

“I will not allow them to drag the Speaker into their politics. I will let the people decide whether they were right to walk out and whether I was right in rejecting their motion,” he said.

July 14, 2008 - Posted by | Politics

2 Comments »

  1. I do have my doubts about this no-confidence motion. I mean, the entire point of the rise of the opposition, esp the momentum they’ve taken on since 308, is to challenge the BN’s hold on power and through that, the PM. the PR is given a mandate to rule and show that they’re worthy of the ppl’s support, why the need for this motion? I do believe the MPs can put their time in the House to better use.

    Comment by Strumme | July 15, 2008

  2. Pada pandangan saya PR berprinsip untuk bebas bersuara atas kapasitinya sebagai perwakilan yang dipilih oleh marhaen dalam isu yang kini berlaku di seluruh dunia yakni fungsi kerajaan dan kesannya ke atas sosial- ekonomi warga yang tidak seimbang di antara marhaen dan apabila perbincangan tidak dibolehkan membuktikan Parlimen perlu direformasikan sebelum ia mahu disenaraikan sebagai Parlimen Berkelas Dunia.

    Perlu dimoralkan apakah undang-undang memberikan garis sekatan untuk mengecualikan hak-hak individu dari disabitkan dengan penyelahgunaan kuasa?

    Langkah PR memberi keyakinan suara marhaen benar-benar diwakili.

    Warga melihat kelemahan berada di pihak kerajaan BN.

    Comment by teeja | July 15, 2008


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: