Fuziah Salleh

Mendamba Politik Baru

Police call in Raja Petra for questioning

Malaysiakini.com
Fauwaz Abdul Aziz | May 2, 08 1:56pm
Blogger Raja Petra Kamarudin has been called in by the police to have his statement recorded over a recent internet posting pertaining to the Altantuya Shaariibuu murder case.

His wife Marina Lee Abdullah told Malaysiakini that Raja Petra had gone to the federal police’s cybercrimes division at 4pm.

Earlier, the police said the blogger’s statement would be recorded tomorrow morning.

This morning, seven police officers from the division – led by DSP Victor Sanjos – were at Raja Petra’s house in Sungai Buloh from 9am to 11am. They confiscated the blogger’s laptop and CPU.

raja petra dang wangi 250707When contacted, Sanjos said the police are investigating the blogger (left) under the Sedition Act 1948 for incitement and also because he “commented on a case before the court made its decision.”

Sanjos also said Superintendent Gan Tack Guan – the investigating officer of the Altantuya murder case – had lodged a police report against Raja Petra.

“We asked Raja Petra whether he was the one who wrote the blog posting, whether he posted the blog, and whether he owned Malaysia Today on which the comments were posted.

“He answered ‘yes’ to all three questions,” he said.

‘Send murderers to hell’

On April 25, Raja Petra wrote ‘Let’s send the Altantuya murderers to hell’. The posting implicated Deputy Prime Minister Najib Razak and his wife Rosmah Mansor in the high-profile case.

Najib subsequently issued a denial through his press secretary Tengku Sariffuddin Tengku Ahmad. Whereas, Rosmah has also denied the allegations against her.

Contacted earlier, Raja Petra confirmed that the police had visited him.

The 58-year-old blogger, who is no stranger to controversy, was grilled by the police for eight hours last year after former Selangor menteri besar Muhammad Muhd Taib filed a police report against him.

Taib, who is now regional and rural development minister, had claimed that Raja Petra published postings and articles that were disrespectful to the King and Islam.

The Altantunya murder trial is currently ongoing at the Shah Alam High Court.

A close aide to Najib, political analyst Abdul Razak Baginda and two police special operations force personnel have been charged with the murder of the Mongolian national.

May 2, 2008 - Posted by | Politics

3 Comments »


  1. ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

    IF YOU NEED A BLOG, DONT FORGET TO SEE HERE: leoxa.com
    (The themes is so beautiful & also able to place adsense)

    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
    many people have moved from other blog to Leoxa.com blog because the themes is very beautiful

    Comment by chuanwei | May 3, 2008

  2. If Raja Petra Kamaruddin who is a true pillar of our Malaysian society and a man who is well known for standing up for Justice & Rule of law can be charged under this offence, THEN I WISH TO ASK THE A-G, JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI AND PRESIDENT OF THE COURT OF APPEAL, TAN SERI ZAKI AZMI, president & secretary of bar council, WHY THEY DO NOT CHARGE ME FOR CALLING JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI FOR CALLING HER A CRIMINAL. I believe that since my defence is the defence of TRUTH, they shy away from prosecuting me.
    To provide them (above mentioned people) with similar material for charging me under that criminal offences, I will publish my charges framed as question to be asked in Parliament. I was hoping that these questions will be asked, but no such luck. However, I will publish these comments that says Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali is a criminal for aiding & abetting respondents Stephen Lim, Wong Kem Chen & Kwong Sea yoon; together with other criminal offences.
    I ask Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali to make formal charges in Australia or apply foor my extradition so that her criminal actions & criminal behaviour can be judged by a true & proper Court of Law where the judges are ethical & KNOW THEIR LAW.
    QUESTIONS FOR PARLIAMENTRY QUESTION TIME
    I refer to the High Court at Kuala Lumpur Originating Petition No. D2-26-41 OF 2001 ; Lim Choi Yin v. McLaren Saksama (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd and to the adjudicating Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, of said Petition. According to CHARGES made by one Yap Chong Yee husband of Petitioner Lim Choi Yin, Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali had 1st approved all 6 Respondents’ application for security for costs in the sum of Rm.60,000 and upon payment of said security for costs of said Rm.60,000, Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali followed up the receipt of said Rm.60,000 by the approval to Respondent Stephen Lim Cheng Ban a 2nd and subsequent application by Respondent Stephen Lim Cheng Ban for an Order to strike out said Petition.
    The second and subsequent Application for an order to strike out said Petition was made even without there being any court order for the SETTING ASIDE of the 1st order for securing said Rm/60,000 for security for costs pursuant to the 1st order made by Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali. That being the facts of the case my question directed to the attention of the Malaysian Attorney General Tan Seri……. Are the following :
    (1)Was not the conduct of Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali’s approval of Mr Stephen Lim Cheng Ban’s 2nd and subsequent application to strike out said Petition, while the said cash of Rm60,000 security for costs was still held in the hands of all 6 respondents to the petition, pursuant to the order made by Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali to petitioner to provide security for costs constitute ABUSE OF POWER ?
    Will the Attorney General investigate Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali for the criminal charge of ABUSE OF POWER & MALFEASANCE and will the Attorney General, if upon investigation find that sufficient evidence exist to support a criminal Charge against Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali for abuse of power and/or FOR MALFEASANCE proceed to lay criminal charges against Judge Zainon for a criminal prosecution ?
    (2)Is it not the case that while Respondent Stephen Lim Cheng Ban and the other 5 respondents hold on to the security for costs pursuant to Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali’s order to Petitioner to provide security for costs and in the absence of any Order to set aside the 1st Order for security for costs, the conduct of Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali together with the conduct of the 6 respondents IN TAKING AND KEEPING SAID RM.60,000 not amount to committing the criminal offence of obtaining money under false pretences ? And further, do the facts not indicate that Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali together with the 6 respondents had acted with a common intention to induce Petitioner to pay said Rm.60,000 while not intending that upon payment of said Rm.60,000 THERE WILL BE A COURT TRIAL OF SAID PETITION ? The being the case do the facts not constitute a conspiracy to obtain money under false pretences ? The facts speak for themselves as an investigation will prove.
    Will the Attorney General investigate said 2 police reports and if the investigation give up facts that will support criminal charges against the said parties, will the Attorney General lay criminal charges against such persons ?
    Petitioner’s husband Yap Chong Yee had formally filed 2 police reports at the Balai Polis Jln. Tun H S Lee, in the first police report Yap Chong Yee had CHARGED the respondents Stephen Lim Cheng Ban, Wong Kem Chen and Kwong Sea Yoon with PERJURY, for having lied in their supporting affidavits applying for security for costs.
    In the second police report Yap Chong Yee had Charged Stephen Lim Cheng Ban with FORGERY, PERJURY AND FABRICATION OF EVIDENCE, contained in his supporting affidavits applying for leave to strike out said petition.
    Both police reports were annexed to Petitioner’s affidavits as exhibits supporting Petitioner’s application for leave to cross examine said 3 respondents for PERJURY & FORGERY and both of Petitioner’s applications were refused leave to cross examine said Respondents, by Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali. The refusal by Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali to allow Petitioner leave to cross examine Respondent Stephen Lim and made in the face of the existence of 2 FORMAL POLICE REPORTS THAT CHARGED STEPHEN LIM CHENG BAN with Perjury & forgery constitutes the charge of MALFEASANCE, AIDING & ABETTING Stephen Lim Cheng Ban to commit the criminal offences of PERJURY & FORGERY.
    Will the Attorney General investigate these criminal charges that are made against Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali and if sufficient evidence is uncovered that will support criminal charges, will the Attorney General prefer criminal charges against Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali; will the attorney General formally charge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali with the said criminal offences ?

    Comment by yapchongyee | May 3, 2008

  3. ================
    ================
    NOW AVAILABLE CHRISTIANITY MADE IN MALAYSIA!!!
    ================
    ================
    EVERY CHRISTIAN NOW MUST LEARN ARABIC. THE FIRST LESSON IS SAY “ALLAH” AND NOT “GOD”.
    This is because English language not suitable anymore because the original bible is in Arabic.

    Get the full story here: http://ckasih.blogspot.com

    Comment by ckasih | May 3, 2008


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: