Fuziah Salleh

Mendamba Politik Baru

MAJLIS PERJUMPAAN KESYUKURAN RAKYAT 22 MAC 2008

Photobucket

March 17, 2008 - Posted by | Politics

8 Comments »

  1. Congratulations on your victory as new MP for Kuantan….sorry I won’t address you as YB.
    Was disappointed that BR did not do well to form the new BR govt in Pahang but nevertheless…its a good start winning 2 Parliamentary seats. Lets hope you and ur fellow MP will work double hard in helping BR to push for a better show come the next GE.
    Please be reminded that we are watching you in your performance and your services to the people of Pahang will be closely scrutinized.

    I believe you will not let all voters who voted BR…so please continue your cooperation with DAP and PAS to secure the next Pahang govt and sack the gangster MB Adnan….

    Thank you

    Comment by chanjoe | March 17, 2008

  2. Tahniah atas kejayaan dilantik sebagai wakil rakyat.
    Majlis 2 Mac? Buat terkezut saja sebab tarikh tu belum pilihanraya. Saya kat KL tak dapatlah nak bersama.

    Comment by zach | March 17, 2008

  3. Congratulations on being selected by the people of Kuantan to serve
    us as our MP!

    As a Kuantan boy (I lived the first 18 years of my life in Kuantan), I sincerely
    hope that your time as the MP for Kuantan will bring more improvements
    to our town as well as uplift the lives of its residents. Let the voices of the ordinary people of Kuantan be heard in the corridors of power, promote the economy of the region, implement policies to improve the standard of living of the less privileged residents and encourage all to live together in harmony and mutual tolerance!

    Allow me to post here one of my favourite quotes:

    “A truly great person is one whom
    money and rank cannot corrupt,
    poverty and hardship cannot shake,
    and power and force cannot subjugate”
    Mencius

    Associate Professor Phua Kai Lit
    Monash University Sunway Campus School of Medicine & Health Sciences
    Bandar Sunway, Selangor

    Comment by Phua Kai Lit | March 18, 2008

  4. Tahniah atas kemenangan YB. Kami di Kuantan amat berharap pembaharuan dapat dibuat. Namun begitu kami faham bahawa perubahan tidak akan dapat dibuat selagi Ayahanda masih bertahta. Masalah pembalakan masih akan berlaku selagi dia ada. Pahang perlukan perubahan

    Comment by rahmat | March 19, 2008

  5. Yap Chong Yee,
    5a Prinsep Road,
    Attadale, WA 6156,
    Western Australia,
    Email :yap.chongyee@yahoo.com,
    Blogg. :http://yap.chongyee.blogspot.com

    Dear YB. Datin Dr. Wan Azzizah,

    Re :APPEAL TO YB. Datin Dr. Wan Azzizah TO
    ASK 3 QUESTION IN PARLIAMENT

    I write to Dato Seri as the leader of the opposition in Parliament. I have been unjustly aggrieved by the criminal behaviour of Dato Zainon binti Mohd.Ali when she sat as High Court Bench adjudicating my wife’s application by ORIGINATING PETITION No : D-2-26-41-01 in the High Court, KL Judge Datin Zainon binti Mohd. Ali had perverted the course of justice, committed aiding & abetting respondents in PERJURY & FORGERY, she committed the criminal offence of Malfeasance.

    I am writing this same letter to YB. Miss Fong Po Kuan as a Member of Parliament. I appeal to both of your Excellency to ask 3 questions in Parliament because the criminal behaviour of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali has illegally and unlawfully rendered my wife’s petition without any remedy at all whatsoever. I graduated in Law in 1967 from the University of Singapore and I practiced law in KL until we emigrated to Asutralia in 1978. The details of how and why Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali committed these acts are set out below. The short statement for what Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali did to KILL MY WIFE’S PETITION and deny it all remedy is that by her awarding to respondents BOTH (1) Order for security for costs and after my wife had paid the sum of ringgit 60,000 Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali went on to award to respondents another order to strike out said petition. (2) the later and subsequent order to strike out said petition CANNOT BE AWARDED BECAUSE THEY ARE 2 SIDES OF THE SAME COING; because to award the said 2 ORDERS IS TO STRIKE OUT ONE AGAINST THE OTHER (one is + and the other is – and if you add the 2 it will become zero).

    I believed the PKR, PAS and the DAP coalition when they campaigned on the platform (among other issues) of the dire need to reform the Judiciary and to give the nation a clean, transparent, and independent judiciary that is ethical and corruption free. I believe that this GOVERNMENT IN WAITING OF THE UNITED FRONT that has just dealt a devastating blow to the integrity and very survival of the Barisan National and that this government in waiting can deliver this change to the Judiciary even as we speak; and that my way is the best way to achieve this transformation to a clean judiciary. What could be more effective than to put a Judge of the Highest Court in Malaysia ( Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali is now a judge in the COURT OF APPEAL) in jail for having committed several crimes while Adjudicating my wife’s Petition to wit, Originating Petition No. D2-26-41-01 in the High Court , Kuala Lumpur, re : Lim Choi Yin vs. McLaren Saksama (Malaysia)Sdn. Bhd.

    I have written copiously on the illegality of the actions of Judge dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali and her criminal conduct; just go to my blogg. At http://yap.chongyee.blogspot.com. I have at all times sent a copy of any letters to the Attorney general, Chief Judge of the High Curt of Malaya, President & Secretary of the Malaysian Bar Council and to many practicing lawyers randomly and others randomly as well.

    My way is to force the Judiciary to ENFORCE THE LAW of Malaysia and not to pervert the course of justice, as they are now doing BY NOT OBLIGATING THEMSELVES TO ENFORCE THE LAW. In all of my years practicing at the Bar, I, like all those who are now practicing at the Malaysian Bar never at anytime know that by the English Common Law that is incorporated under the Malaysian Constitution to become the Law of Malaysia, there exist a law called MALFEASANCE which is both a criminal offence and a TORT as well, any government official (JUDGES AS WELL) who fails to DO WHAT HE IS REQUIRED TO DO BY LAW COMMITS THE OFFENCE OF MALFEASANCE AND CAN BE REMOVED FROM OFFICE.

    Therefore by the law of malfeasance I CHARGE JUDGE DATO ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI of the Malaysian Court of Appeal with having deliberately refusing to grant leave to Petitioner at her application to cross examine the respondents Lim Cheng Ban, Wong Kem Chen and Kwong Sea Yoon for committing PERJURY & Forgery; the supporting submission are discussed in my blogg. Cited above. This submission is too long for the average to read through, hence I will set out and discuss a shorter way towards prosecuting Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali.

    This shorter way is to discuss one of the many issues that will penalize Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali for breach of the Malaysian Penal Code, and the facts are as follows :

    (1) Respondents applied for security for costs in the sum of ringgit 650,000 to prove 1 sheet of paper namely ONE COMPANY RESOLUTION. Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali approved this application but at the reduced sum of ringgit 60,000 which my wife paid and was received by respondents as SECURITY FOR COSTS. The Law of Civil Procedure mandates that when security for costs is paid it automatically follows that the Petition must be tried in court.
    (2) At the payment by my wife of the said ringgit 60,000 Stephen Lim Cheng Ban quickly applied to strike out said petition IN ORDER TO STOP THE FURTHER PROGRESS OF SAID PETITION. Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali approved his application; this second approval and award of the order to strike out said petition is unlawful and illegal. Arising from this criminal behaviour are several breaches of the Criminal Penal Code. Full details are discussed in my Blogg.
    (3) The deliberate criminal behaviour of Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali has buried unjustly and illegally my wife’s petition and leave us with no recourse for Justice before the Law.

    I appeal to YB. Datin Wan Azziza as leader of the opposition, and to YB Miss Fong Po Kuan to ask 3 question in Parliament so that those issues can be investigated by the Attorney General’s Department with a view to prosecute Judge zainon binti Mohd. Ali and her accomplices fro breaches of the Criminal Penal Code.

    I again appeal to both of your Excellency to ask the following questions :

    (1)WHY DID JUDGE DATO ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI APPROVE SIMULTANEOUSLY (A) ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS AND WHEN RINGGIT 60,000 WAS PAID TOWARDS SECURITY FOR COSTS SHE WENT ON (B) TO ORDER FOR THE STRIKING OUT SAID PETITION.

    (2) The Order for security for costs was performed by Petitioner and she paid the required sum of ringgit 60,000 towards it and yet there was no application by Mr Stephen Lim Cheng Ban or any of the respondents to REMOVE THE AWARD FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS BEFORE THEY SUBMITTED THEIR APPLICATION FOR STRIKING OUT SAID PATITION, THEREFORE HOW IS IT POSSIBLE FOR JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI TO EVEN CONSIDER RESPONDENTS’ APPLICATION FOR STRIKING OUT OF SAID PETITION, because the Order for security for costs is still a “LIVE PETITION”.

    (4) The legal position of the ORDER FOR SECURITY FOR COSTS in accordance with the FACTS OF THIS CASE (security for costs having been paid and accepted by respondents) and in according to the law of Civil Procedure cannot be rendered void; because Petitioner’s performance of the Order for security for costs was accepted by all the respondents of the ringgit 60,000 and Judge zainon binti Mohd. Ali had on her own initiative amended the ORDER FOR PAYMENT; therefore the performance of the order of security for costs was already acted upon by all parties, Petitioner, Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali and all respondents. This position cannot be altered by Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali and the behest of the respondents alone. Therefore, the question to the Parliament is WHAT REASON CAN JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI GIVE TO JUSTIFY HER CRIMINAL BEHAVIOUR ?

    If the BARISAN ALTERNATIVE is serious about reforming the JUDICIARY so that Malaysia can again have a judiciary that we can all be proud of and a judiciary that will deliver JUSTICE ACCORDING TO LAW, then you have the best OPPORTUNITY TO ACHIEVE THIS OUT COME.

    I HAD INTENDED NOT TO PUBLISH this letter on my blogg but I have not been able to find your address in Kuala Lumpur so I am taking the easier way to publish this letter as usual. I will also publish this letter on Miss Fong Po Kuan MP for Batu Gajah blogg as I have been doing so over the election. YB. Datin Azziza and YB. Miss Fong Po Kuan MP for Batu Gajah. May I suggest that the Lingam Types did a lot of good for the Barisan Alternative and I believe that the issues arising from my wife’s petition will do even more to clean the Malaysian Judiciary; it has come at a time when Dato Seri is riding the crest of the wave.

    THANK YOU TO BOTH OF YOUR EXCELLENCY !

    I am Yours Faithfully Yap Chong Yee.

    Comment by yapchongyee | March 20, 2008

  6. Yap Chong Yee,

    5a Prinsep Road,

    Attadale, WA 6156

    Email :ychongyee@yahoo.com.au

    Blogg. http://yapchongyee.blogspot.com

    To,

    HRH, Yang Mulia’ Regent Perak,

    Raja Nazrin Shah,(forgive my ignorance of Royal Protocol)

    Re: Re : Originating Petition No. D2-26-41 OF 2001 ;

    Lim Choi Yin v. McLaren Saksama (Malaysia) Sdn. Bhd

    Yang Mulia,

    I read your address to the conference of judges at the Marriot Hotel, Putra Jaya, and I have to say that if your wish for an independent judiciary is progressed along the path that you had enunciated in your speech, then Malaysia will indeed REGAIN the respect & trust in the Malaysian Judiciary that was the admiration of all of South East Asia.

    The present state of the Malaysian Judiciary is the laughing stock of the world and if I might add, the state of the Malaysian Judiciary today can only be rivalled by the standard of Administration of the LAW & JUSTICE THAT EXIST IN INDONESIA. Forgive me for saying so, but there is a state of utter lawlessness prevailing in Malaysia. Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali, who now sits on the bench of the Malaysian Court of Appeal, and who as the judge of 1st instance UNLAWFULLY AND ILLEGALLY STRUCK OFF MY WIFE’S ABOVE PETITION, the details of her criminal behaviour is fully documented in my blogg. At http://yapchongyee.blogspot.com. The details are too lengthy to discuss here; however, I can state that I graduated from the University of Singapore in Law in 1967 and I practised at the Malaysian bar from 1967 until I migrated to Australia in 1978.

    Either through ignorance of the law relevant to issues raised in my wife’s petition, Judge Dato Zainon binti Mohd. Ali or that she intentionally DISREGARDED the provisions of the law relevant to my wife’s case or even more heinously she acted CORRUPTLY, Judge zainon binti Mohd. Ali committed several criminal offences while adjudicating my wife’s case on the bench. This ridiculous turn of events must be unprecedented in all of history of the British Commonwealth (since we all share the same legal history).

    I have written to the Chief Justice of Malaysia and I enclose a copy to this letter. I had written to the Chief Justice several times but I have never ever received ny replies. This is an official compliant so I do not see under what circumstances can the Chief Justice or the Attorney General can refuse to reply.

    If Yang Mulia, is serious about what you said at the conference of Judges, then allow me to reiterate that even a JUDGE OF THE HIGHEST COURT OF MALAYSIA MUST BE HELD ACCOUNTABLE FOR COMMITTING CRIMES. Judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali committed several criminal offences and must be held accountable for them.

    As a demonstration of my good faith, IF UPON INVESTIGATION OF THE FACTS THAT I CHARGED JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI WITH HAVING COMMITTED IS FOUND TO BE TRUE THEN IS IT NOT THE DUTY OF THE A.-G TO PROSECUTE JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI ? In this event I will be available to defend myself in court. TO PROVE THAT MALYSIA WANTS AN INDEPENDENT JUDICIARY THAT IS ETHICAL, HONEST AND ADMINISTER THE LAW IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE LAW, The Malaysian Attorney General can do the following, upon police investigation of the facts that I have charged her with :

    (1) IF POLICE INVESTIGATION INTO MY CHARGES AGAINST JUDGE ZAINON ARE VALID AND THERE IS/ARE REASONABLE CAUSE TO CHARGE JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI WITH COMMITTING CRIMINAL OFFENCES, THEN I WILL COME TO KL TO BEAR WITNESS,

    OR

    (2)If upon police investigation there is no basis for charging judge Zainon binti Mohd. Ali with criminal offences then obviously I have both libelled or more seriously for committing the more serious crime of SEDITION in with case the Malaysian Attorney General is under a duty to apply for my extradition to be charged in a Malaysian Court.

    If Yang Mulia is serious about bringing change to the Malaysian Judiciary then this case is the most open demonstration of that resolve.

    Yours Sincerely,

    Yapchongyee

    Date 10 April, 2008

    Copy : ATTORNEY GENERAL, CHIEF JUSTICE MALAYSIA, MALAYSIAN BAR, PRESIDENT & SECRETARY, JUDGE ZAINON BINTI MOHD. ALI, EMAIL TO ALL AND SUNDRY LEGAL PRACTITIONERS.

    Comment by yapchongyee | April 10, 2008

  7. Занимаюсь дизайном и хочу попросить автора fuziahsalleh2.wordpress.com отправить шаьлончик на мой мыил) Готов заплатить…

    Comment by obera | October 14, 2008


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: