Fuziah Salleh

Mendamba Politik Baru

Program Jejak Fakir Parlimen Kuantan 5-13 Sept 2009

Seperti Ramadhan ditahun-tahun lain, Parlimen Kuantan tidak melupakan fakir miskin dan orang-orang yang memerlukan di bulan yang mulia ini.

Untuk makluman sdr/sdri, prog JEJAK  FAKIR disekitar Parlimen Kuantan tahun ini ialah sepanjang 5-13 Sept 2009.

Dengan itu saya pohon keprihatinan sdr/ sdri sekiranya ingin menyumbang sedeqah atau menyalurkan duit zakat untuk program tersebut.

Semoga Allah SWT ampunkan dosa2 kita, meredhai segala usaha kita dan melapangkan hidup kita diakhirat nanti sebagaimana kita melapangkan hidup mereka yg memerlukan bantuan didunia ini.

Segala sumbangan@ zakat boleh disalurkan kepada akaun
MAYBANK  atas nama ‘Pejabat Ahli Parlimen Kuantan.’

Terima Kasih

Hjh Fuziah Salleh,
Ahli Parlimen Kuantan.

August 26, 2009 - Posted by Fuziah Salleh | Politics | | 10 Comments

10 Comments »

  1. Saya tidak faham Puan YB, mengenai isu-isu yang dipaksakan ke atas minda warga jika hanya kepala lembu dan Mr Samy yang menjadi liputan.

    Adakah jenayah di dalam sosial masyarakat mempunyai perkaitan dengan sorotan impak yang dihasilkan oleh isu-isu itu?

    Comment by thanaif | August 29, 2009

  2. Saya harap YB dapat mengeluarkan arahan kepada semua Dun diBawah Parlimen Kuantan, supaya bekerja keras mencari semua rakyat termiskin, oku, ibu tunggal, warga mas dan yg sewaktu denganya, supaya mereka ini mendpt hak mereka.

    klu bolih hantar je nama2 mereka ke Jabatan Kebajikan Masyarakat dan Rumah Penyayang bagi diberi bantuan yg sepatutnya mereka perolihi, tak kira la, apa parti pun yang PENTING mereka rakyat pahang yang termaksuk dalam senarai mendapat bantuan dari kerajaan.

    Nampaknya, ramai dah yang menyebut2, bahawa YB sangat perihatin dalam masaalah ini, dan pemimpin umno kat kuantan ni pun dah mula kalut mencari fakir2 miskin, bagueh la macam tu.

    Comment by spy rakyat | August 30, 2009

  3. Salam perkenalan buat Tuan rumah. Apakhabar ? Semoga kita mendapat lebih barakah di bulan Ramadan ini. :)

    Comment by Tabib Hj. Norjae Hadi | September 6, 2009

  4. Salam Ramadahn YB,

    No. akaun maybank bagi tujuan jejak fakir ini ada tak?

    Comment by Latifah | September 8, 2009

  5. A tragic yet hilarious court proceeding took place in the Ipoh high court on September 8 when the judge blatantly contradicts himself in dismissing a suit brought by Perak PR speaker against the state BN speaker.

    Judge Azahar rejected Sivakumar suit to seek damages from Ganesan for assault and false imprisonment during the chaotic and violent state assembly sitting on May 7. He said the court had no jurisdiction to hear the case due to Federal Constitution Article 72 stipulating that – the validity of any proceeding in any state assembly cannot be questioned in any court.

    And yet in the same breath he declared that – the decision of the legislative assembly to remove the plaintiff as speaker and to appoint the defendant was conclusive and had been fairly determined by the state assembly on May 7, 2009.

    Now, the crux of the entire contention between the two speakers is: who is on the right side of law in the violent tussle for the speaker chair on May 7?

    By declaring Ganesan as the rightful speaker, Judge Azahar is in fact making a legal judgment. Is that not a breach of Article 72? How come he has no jurisdiction to hear Sivakumar grievances but has jurisdiction to judge Ganesan as legal speaker? Is that not a contradiction of the highest order?

    Apart from this atrocious double standard applied by the judge, the main flaw of the judgment is the inability to differentiate between assembly proceeding and criminal behaviour. What Sivakumar is seeking is redress for the unlawful physical violence inflicted on him. And Article 72 covers only businesses conducted in the assembly – not unlawful and criminal act.

    Judge Azahar has therefore wrongly used Article 72 to come to his judgment. To make it very clear that this is the case, I will quote in full the relevant clauses in Article 72 (Clauses 1 & 2) and explain the reasons why.

    Clause 1: The validity of any proceedings in the Legislative Assembly of any State shall not be questioned in any court.

    Clause 2: No body shall be liable to any proceedings in any court in respect of anything said or vote given by him when taking part in proceedings of the Legislative Assembly of any State or of any committee thereof.

    Note the operative words “proceedings” in Clause 1 and “anything said or any vote given” in Clause 2.

    It is abundantly clear what Article 72 refers to are the speeches and resolutions made in the assembly, not any criminal or unlawful act.

    But what happened on May 7 was complete pandemonium and chaos in the assembly hall. There was no chance to conduct any business at all, least of all any resolution passed. In fact the only business done on that day was the address by the Perak Regent Raja Nazrin Shah.

    And how was Sivakumar replaced by Ganesan during that pandemonium?

    While Sivakumar was sitting in the speaker chair, hordes of police personnel entered the assembly hall, allegedly on Ganesan order, and physically lifted, carried, dragged and moved speaker Sivakumar into a room where he was forcibly detained until the assembly sitting was over.

    And as soon as Sivakumar was removed from the hall, police personnel escorted Ganesan into the hall and ushered him to the speaker chair, with police personnel making a line to stand guard in front of Ganesan to prevent any assemblymen from reaching the speaker chair.

    The entire tragedy-comedy was stage managed by the police, and it is therefore more appropriate to say that while Sivakumar was elected by the assembly through a reolution, Ganesan was physically planted into the speaker chair by the police. And that about sums up what happened on that tragic hilarious day.

    And since Judge Azahar appears to be so respectful of the constitutional principle of separation of power as demonstrated by his professed adherence to Article 72, is it not puzzling that he should have chosen to ignore completely the heinous violation of the doctrine of separation of power when hordes of police personnel invaded the assembly to physically replace one speaker with another?

    Is it not another shining example of double standard in the Malaysia Boleh tradition?

    After the series of judicial decisions that appear to wantonly trample the constitution and the law following the shameful power grab in Perak, the latest low represented by Azahar decision makes us wonder how much lower our judiciary can sink into, as many more judicial decisions in the same series are still pending.

    Comment by ruyom | September 9, 2009

  6. salam aidil fitri YB,

    bila nak buat open house??

    waslm

    Comment by tokan99 | September 16, 2009

  7. Salam ramadan dan lailatul qadar

    Comment by SINGAMARAJA | September 17, 2009

  8. Sdr Latifah,
    Program Jejak Fakir sudah pun berakhir, namun kerja kami berterusan, walaupun bukan lagi di bulan Ramadhan.
    Sekiranya sdri ingin menyumbang, sila hubungi Pn Baini di Pusat Khidmat ditalian 0192702838 untuk dapatkan no akaun PEJABAT AHLI PARLIMEN KUANTAN
    Terima Kasih diatas sokongan
    Fuziah

    Comment by Fuziah Salleh | September 22, 2009

  9. Salam ziarah lebaran

    Comment by SINGAMARAJA | September 26, 2009

  10. Salam sejahtera YB Fuziah,
    More Rakyat are paying more attention to the economic and local politic development.
    We are unhappy with Be-eNd government and pegawai who have waste our taxpayers money ,, as listed in the Auditor General Report 2008..

    We trust PR assemblers are not corrupt as this..
    Thank you ..

    Comment by weng | October 26, 2009


Leave a comment

« Previous | Next »