Keputusan Kabinet tidak Ambil Kira Kemaslahatan Anak-Anak

Keputusan kabinet 23 April amat-amat membimbangkan dan tentu skali boleh membawa kepada masalah sosial kelak. Keadaan anak-anak yg terumbang ambing tanpa bimbingan agama yg mantap dari ibubapa yg telah berubah agama ialah antara punca kepada pemasaalahn dikalangan remaja. Contoh apabila ibubapa menukar agama, siapakah yg akan mendapat hak penjagaan nanti? Sekiranya yg mendapat hak penjagaan itu beragama berbeza daripada yg ditetapkan keatas anak, bagaimana pula? Siapa pula yg akan di pertanggungjawabkan dlm hal membimbing agama? Keputusan kabinet ini merupakan tindakan yg tidak fikir panjang dan tidak meletakkan kepentingan anak sebagai utama.

Keputusan ini juga telah membelakangkan agama Islam dimana pandangn Islam ialah apabila salah seorang dari ibu bapa masuk Islam, maka status anak mereka yg dibawah umur ialah beragama Islam juga.

Hjh Fuziah Salleh,

Ahli Parlimen Ktn

KENYATAAN MEDIA-SIDANG DUN PAHANG

KENYATAAN MEDIA

21 April 2009

 

SIDANG DUN PAHANG

 

Pagi tadi saya berpeluang meluangkan masa menghadiri siding DUN Pahang. Memandangkan pengundi di kawasan saya banyak membangkitkan hal-hal pentadbiran Kerajaan Negri, maka saya kira wajar saya menjengok ke persidangan tersebut untuk mendapatkan pandangan terus serta mendengar  perbahasan secara langsung.

 

Disini saya ingin menyatakan kekesalan saya diatas pencelahan ADUN Kerdau sebentar tadi. Didalam pencelahan beliau keatas perbahasan titah diRaja ADUN Triang, ADUN Kerdau telah membuat kenyataan yang membawa implikasi bahawa kehadiran saya di Dewan ialah diatas dasar memantau secara dekat perbahasan ADUN-ADUN pembangkang, malah beliau menuduh perbahasan ADUN Triang yang didakwanya tidak relevant  berpunca dari saya dan berasaskan hujah dari saya.  Walaubagaimanapun beliau tidak berani menyebut nama saya secara telus.

 

Saya ingin menegaskan disini bahawa Kenyataan ADUN Kerdau:

1.    Menghina Dewan yang Mulia, berniat jahat dan mempunyai motif politik di dalam keadaan saya tidak boleh bersuara sebagai pemerhati

2.    Mencerminkan dangkalnya pemahaman politik seorang ADUN BN yang mencerminkan secara jelas bahawa beliau tidak memahami proses demokrasi dimana sesiapa sahaja boleh hadir menjadi pemerhati di galeri Dewan.

3.    Melambangkan sempitnya minda serta tandus dan bankrupnya ide seorang ADUN;  tidak ada perbahasan yang bernas sebagai hujah, sehingga beliau terpaksa menyerang seorang Ahli Parlimen yang hanya hadir sebagai pemerhati.

Didalam keadaan kita harus bekerjasama demi membangunkan rakyat dan negeri Pahang, dimana Dato Seri YAB MB juga telah mengalu-alukan kehadiran saya di Dewan, kualiti kenyataan YB Kerdau sungguh  memalukan rakyat  yang telah memilih beliau selaku wakil mereka.

 

Saya tuntut beliau tarik balik kenyataan beliau terhadap saya secara terbuka.

 

Sekiranya berterusan beginilah kualiti ADUN di Pahang, maka malanglah nasib rakyat Pahang.

 

Fuziah Salleh

Ahli Parlimen Kuantan

21 April 2009

PEMERHATI DI SIDANG DUN PAHANG

Pada 21hb April saya telah meluangkan masa untuk mengikuti perjalanan sidang DUN Pahang yang berjalan dari 20-27 April 2009. Rupa-rupanya kehadiran saya disitu sebagai pemerhati di galeri cukup memanaskan tempat duduk beberapa ADUN dari BN. sehinggakan ada yang menuduh bahawa saya memantau prestasi ADUN PR dan ada juga tuduhan yang mengatakan bahawa ucapan junjung kasih titah di raja Sultan oleh ketua Pembangkang di olah oleh saya. AGak lucu sekali pandangan-pandangn ini, serta ianya menunjukkan betapa takutnya BN dengan bayang-bayang mereka sendiri.  Yang peliknya ADUN yang menuduh saya tersebut, bila saya jumpa dilobby dan bertanya secara terbuka serta mengatakan kepada beliau kenapa beliau hanya berani menuduh saya didalam Dewan, tatkala saya sebagai pemerhati tidak dapat bersuara  Beliau hanya berdiam, yang jelas pucat muka. rupa-rupanya dia hanya berani attack perempuan dalam Dewan mungkin dengan andaian bahawa orang perempuan akan menagis dan tidak melawan, Maaf saya katakan disini. Dia silap orang…….(Sila lihat Kenyataan Media saya berkenaan hal ini)

GALERI SEKITAR DSAI DIKUANTAN 18hb APRIL

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

HIDDEN DRAMAS HOURS BEFORE NAJIB’S SWEARING IN?

Interesting Article by Km Quek which I would like to share with readers of this blog.

Kim Quek is a renown political analyst and writer.

HIDDEN DRAMAS HOURS BEFORE NAJIB’S SWEARING-IN?

13.04.2009

Unusual occurrences on the day before Najib Razak’s swearing-in as prime minister have raised questions on the royal consent to his appointment.

From the time Najib left the palace ground at 1215 hrs on April 2, after an audience with the King, the nation was kept in darkness for seven hours as to whether the King had given his consent to Najib’s premiership.  It was not until 1938 hrs that the first newsbreak came from Bernama stating that Chief Secretary to the Government Mohd Sidek Hassan announced that the King had given his consent to Najib’s appointment and that Najib would swear-in at 1000 hrs the next day – which was the time previously circulated by the government.  Was it not most extra-ordinary that the nation was kept in suspense for so many hours when the ceremony was only hours away?  What was the reason for this big delay in announcement?  Was there any problem with the royal consent?

That something was amiss was apparent in the morning of April 2 when then Prime Minister Abdullah Badawi went alone to meet the King, contradicting Najib’s disclosure on the preceding day (April 1) that he was invited by Abdullah to accompany the latter to meet the King for the royal consent to Abdullah’s resignation and Najib’s appointment.

Abdullah arrived at the palace at 1000 hrs for an audience with the King to express his intention to relinquish his premiership.  After an hour-long meeting with the King, he  uttered only these words to the official media allowed into the palace: “It’s a matter for Tuanku to decide”.  He drove through the main gate at 1100 hrs without talking to some 70 reporters gathered there.

Minutes later, Najib’s official car and police escort drove past the palace and arrived at Abdullah’s residence at Jalan Bellamy (located near the palace), where the two leaders met for 10 minutes.

Najib, who was called to the palace, arrived at 1130 hrs to have an audience with the King.  He left through the main gate at 1215 hrs and waved to the anxiously waiting reporters through his open window and said “Thank you”, without stopping to talk to them.

STRANGE SILENCE

Thereafter, complete silence – without a word from either the palace or the government on the outcome of the morning’s royal audience given to these two leaders, until Bernama’s statement in the evening.

Observing the above events, we can deduce that

    * It must have been at the King’s request that Abdullah went to see the King alone – without Najib.  Obviously, the King wanted to talk to Abdullah privately, and the hour long audience indicated that much was discussed about the proposed transfer of power.

    * When Abdullah left the palace at 1100 hrs, he gave the impression that the King had yet to decide on his proposed resignation and perhaps also his recommendation of Najib to take over the premiership.  

    * The lack of positive indications from both leaders after their royal audience and the long silence thereafter indicated that royal consent was unlikely to have been given during the audience.  Otherwise, the government would have wasted no time to announce such consent, judging from its impatience to fix the swearing-in time and date, as reflected in several such premature announcements previously.

    * Then, when was royal consent given, if at all it was given?  What transpired between 1215 hrs (when Najib left the palace) and 1938 hrs (when Bernama reported the royal consent) on April 2?

For a better understanding of what actually transpired on April 2, we have to take note of two important events that took place on April 1.

One, Chief Secretary Sidek Hassan announced through Bernama that before the Cabinet meeting in the morning, Abdullah had an audience with the King, whereby the King consented to Najib swearing-in as prime minister at 1000 hrs on April 3 and the King also agreed to grant an audience to both leaders at 1000 hrs the next day, April 2, for this proposed power transfer.   However, at 1954 hrs, Bernama issued another statement saying the Chief Secretary had said his earlier announcement on the swearing-in was premature, and asked for the story to be ignored.

Two, Pakatan Rakyat handed to the King a letter by all its 81 members of parliament, appealing to the King to delay the appointment of Najib as prime minister until many allegations against him were cleared.  These included in particular the shocking scandals of the murder of the Mongolian woman and commissions in the purchase of Scorpene submarines, which of late had been well publicized in news media all over the world.  The letter stated that premiership being the nation’s top job, it ought to be held by some one who was clean and of unquestionable integrity.  It was therefore appropriate that His Majesty delay the appointment till all allegations were investigated by an independent commission and Najib’s name cleared.

ROYAL SECOND THOUGHTS?

Looking at these two events, it is entirely possible that the King could have nodded his head to Abdullah’s proposed transfer of power to Najib early in the morning of April 1, but after deliberation over the appeal by the 81 MPs, the King could have second thoughts about hurrying through the swearing-in the next morning.  Hence the Chief Secretary’s late statement to retract his earlier announcement on April 1, and the separate audience – instead of joint audience – to Abdullah and Najib the next morning.

As a conscientious constitutional monarch who takes his role as guardian of the constitution and the country at heart, it is also possible that Tuanku Mizan could be seriously considering a delay to the power transfer to clear matters up to protect vital national interests.  But his hands appeared to have been forced by the drummed-up publicity for the imminent swearing-in only hours away via premature issue of invitation cards and a questionable last-minute news release by Bernama, both of these are deemed inappropriate.

Since it is the King who accepts the Prime Minister’s resignation, and since it is also his prerogative to appoint the new Prime Minister, shouldn’t it be the palace that makes the announcement of the King’s decision?  Shouldn’t it also be the palace that issues the invitations – instead of the prime minister’s department – for the ceremony at the palace for the handing over of the appointment letter to the new Prime Minister?

Is it not an act of the highest disrespect to the King for the government to issue invitations for the swearing-in of Najib when the King had not even granted an audience to the incumbent Prime Minister to discuss about his proposed resignation?  Or is the government taking the institution of monarchy as a mere rubber stamp?

QUESTIONABLE LEGITIMACY

We can well understand Najib and UMNO’s desperation to ascend the premiership in great urgency, since he has already been hyped as the savior of a sinking ship, and any hindrance to such ascendancy could spell disaster, nevertheless, such usurping of the authority and status of the monarch is an affront on our Constitution and serves to further undermine constitutional rule in this country under Barisan Nasional rule.  It also gives rise to questions about the legitimacy of the new premiership.

It is an ominous start for Najib as Prime Minister, having just added another baggage to the many uncleared baggages Najib is carrying over to his premiership.

Kim Quek

 

DS Anwar Ibrahim di Kuantan Sabtu 18 April 2009

      Makluman:
DS Anwar Ibrahim akan berada di Kuantan sabtu ini untuk program

Perasmian Pejabat Negeri dan Minum Petang bersama Rakyat
Bertempat:- Pejabat Negeri (Depan Klinik Kesihatan) Beserah

Masa :- 5-7 ptg

Ceramah Perdana :- 9 mlm

Sdr/Sdri dijemput untuk bersama=sama meraikan DS Anwar di Kuantan dan sila sebarkan kepada yang lain-lain

 

 

 

 

 

Impian Saya Untuk Kuantan

Gambar ‘Modern Tram’ di Eropah. 

Mengapa kita tidak boleh ada ini di Kuantan?

Kelebihan:

1. Bersih, dan selamat untuk Alam Sekitar yang menambah kepada kelestarian bandar Kauntan.

2. Ianya tidak perlukan infra yang mahal berbanding dengan LRT kerana laluan tram boleh di buat diatas jalan raya

3. Ianya boleh menjadi tarikan pelancong ke Kuantan

4. Bagaimana pula dengan excess capacity IPP yang mana merupakan ketirisan sebanyak RM3 billion setahun. Menteri pernah menjawab kepada soalan saya di Parlimen dengan mengatakan bahawa Kerajaan masih mencari projek untuk menggunakan pengeluaran elektrik yang berlebihan ini . Tidak   wajarkah digunakan untuk menyediakan tenaga percuma atau kos rendah untuk mengoperasi tram ini ?

Didalam keadaan Kuantan berhadapan masalah pengangkutan, MB telah menawarkan supaya saya mencari mana-mana rakan PR yang mahu mengendalikan Bas Bandar. Akan tetapi saya berpandangan bahawa meletakkan pengendali yang lain tidak akan menyelesaikan masalah pengankutan ini. Hanya dengan menukar pengendali, akan mengalihkan masalah ketangan orang lain. mesti ada sebab pengendalian bas bandar di Kuantan mengahadapi masalah sebelum ini. Saya  tidak lihat Kerajaan Negri sebagai mampu untu mengatasi masalah pengangkutan  ini secara kreatif. mungkin kerana kualiti atau kurangnya kualiti dari segi pemikiran ahli-ahli majlis yang merupakan lantikan politik dan juga  kurangnya kualiti pemikiran ahli ahli EXCO untuk melakukan sesuatu yang mampu menyelesaikan masalah pengangkutan di bandar Kuantan.

Tapi kalau tak buat tram sebegini pun, buat bas shuttle dua kali sehari dibawah Kerajaan Negri pun boleh selesai masalah pengangkutan awam di Kuantan tu….yang penting laksanakan survey dan buat feasibility study, serta buat costing. seterusnya ada ‘ political will’ untuk selesaikan masalah rakyat.

JEMPUTAN DARI KELAB PENGENDALI KEDAI KOPI & CAFE MALAYSIA & SINGAPORE

Sabtu 11 April 2009

Saya menerima jemputan ke ‘Gala Dinner’ dari Persatuan Pengendali Kedai-Kedai Kopi & Cafe Malaysia dan Singapore  di Restoran Kamunlau Tg Lumpur.

Pada sebelah siangnya mereka mengadakan AGM mereka dimana Ong Tee Kiat dijemput merasmikan, dan disebelah malam mereka menjemput saya pula dengan dihadiri oleh 103 meja (1300 org) dari Persatuan tersebut, kebanyakan mereka ahli-ahli Kelab, Kuantan Chapter. Sambutan yang begitu menggalakkan membuat saya begitu terharu sekali.

Yang menarik juga ialah dimana mereka telah membelikan saya pizza dan KFC sebagai hidangan di meja VVIP. Mereka juga memastikan bahawa di meja VVIP tiada hidangan yang sensitif kepada umat Islam. Sensitiviti ini juga menyentuh hati saya dan melambangkan integrasi sebenar sedang berlaku di negara kita. Malangnya gambar yang diambil telah ter’delete’ oleh si pengambil gambar.

SUDUT PANDANG TAJUK: KABINET BARU

Sekitar Shooting Live ‘Sudut Pandang’ malam tadi 9 april 2009

“Rakyat mengharapkan REFORM, iaitu perubahan dan pembaikan. Malah UMNO juga mahukan REFORM. Justeru itu Petunjuk Prestasi Utama (KPI) yang di sebut oleh PM  yang telah di wajibkan keatas Para Menteri, mesti lah berpandukan beberapa ‘Key Result Areas’ yang menekankan kepada sistem penyampaian, ‘Benchmarking’, Pengukur Aras dan just Best Practice Model. Contoh membasmi kemiskinan, sekiranya kita mengambil benchmark yang terlalu remdah, yang mana negara-negara mundur seperti negara di Afrika pun sudah tidak menggunakannya, mana mungkin kita boleh mengatakan bahawa kita telah mencapai KPI kita”  tersebut diantara kata -kata awal saya diwaktu permulaan program..

Kemenangan di Dua Bukit

Sumber dari Malaysiakini.com

 Setelah hampir seminggu kami bekerja keras untuk memastikan kemenangan Pakatan Rakyat di Bukit Selambau, akhirnya doa dan usaha menjadi kenyataan. Tambah bersyukur lagi apabila YB Datuk Seri Ir Nizar juga diumumkan menang di Bukit Gantang. Ini membuktikan rakyat mahukan perubahan dan menyokong usaha Pakatan Rakyat bagi melakukan usaha pembaikan untuk negara kita ini.